College Admissions Scandal Update: Lori Loughlin's Guilt May Be Proven In Newly-Released Evidence

New information continues to come to light as Lori Loughlin moves towards her trial for her alleged participation in the college admissions scam.

In 2019, Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, are said to have paid William "Rick" Singer $500,000 so that their daughters, Olivia Jade and Isabella Rose, could attend the University of Southern California (USC). Following the allegations, they were each charged with mail and wire fraud, honest services mail and wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to commit federal programs bribery.

Now, the prosecution has released new evidence that supposedly points to their guilt.

According to the Boston Herald, prosecutors attached the faux crew resume to a response that they submitted in reaction to Loughlin and Giannulli requesting access to telephone records, text messages, and interview transcripts. The documents that they asked for surround Singer's private behavior.

Attached to the response is "a redacted list of crew achievements by a daughter of the couple, whose first name is also blacked out," states the publication. The accomplishments listed on the resume include "top-15 finishes in unspecified categories in 2016 and 2017 at the 'Head of the Charles-Boston' event."

READ: College Admissions Scandal Update: Longest Prison Sentence Before Lori Loughlin's Trial May Indicate Future

Aside from the release of the aforementioned document, prosecutors previously alleged that they are in possession of an email that Giannulli sent to his accountant, in which he reportedly admitted his guilt.

As for Loughlin, it has also been said that the former "Fuller House" actress believes that she has a "secret weapon" that will prove her innocence and that withheld evidence could further her narrative.

Additionally, it has also been said that the "When Call the Heart" star has been taking a "grueling" step behind the scenes as she gears up for her 2020 trial. Despite this, some have suggested that she face the "consequences" due to the fact that her pre-trial "gamble" may not pay off.