Missy S. Mastel Says, 'Storytelling Isn't Enough Anymore, Nonprofits Need Proof Of Concept To Drive Real Change'
For decades, storytelling has been the go-to strategy for nonprofits and charities seeking to inspire donations and support. Heart-wrenching narratives – whether about a neglected animal in a shelter or a child in a war-torn country – have historically been used to pull at the audience's emotions, creating a sense of urgency that often translated into immediate financial contributions. While powerful, this method has reached a point of saturation. Missy Sue Mastel, CPA, CGMA, Founder of Mass-Tel Communications, and a transformational leader in nonprofit strategy, believes that today's donors and stakeholders demand more than emotionally charged appeals. The new currency for change is proof of concept, not just the promise of impact.
The overuse of emotionally charged storytelling has contributed to a phenomenon of desensitization. "How many times can you see a sad dog shivering in the cold before you stop reacting?" Missy asks. "In the U.S., every other advert is a plea for help, often showcasing people or animals in dire situations. Over time, your emotional threshold rises, and what once evoked tears now barely gets a second glance."
In this world where all of these narratives have now become saturated, even the most compelling have lost their ability to move the needle on real change. Social media, streaming platforms, and digital advertising have made these appeals ubiquitous, and audiences are increasingly skeptical. People now wonder about the efficiency of nonprofits and they feel disconnected from the causes shown in these advertisements. It's not that people care less; it's that they want to see real, measurable results for their dollars.
Today's donors – particularly younger generations – are more interested in the tangible outcomes of their contributions. "Gen Z and Millennials want to know that their dollar is going towards real change, and they want to see metrics, not just hear anecdotes," Missy explains. This contrasts sharply with Baby Boomers, for whom emotional storytelling was historically more effective. "It's no longer enough to say, 'We want to alleviate poverty.' The statement should be, 'We're going to reduce poverty by a percentage in this region within the next (number) of years.' It needs to be focused, measurable, and verifiable."
To illustrate, Missy points to a wildlife conservation project she worked with, which had previously relied on traditional storytelling to attract funds. "They used to run ads showing Black Rhinos in desperate situations to evoke sympathy. But when we started providing metrics – how the population grew from 16 to 279 in a decade – donations increased significantly. People want to know, 'How close are you to your goal? What does my contribution do to move the needle?'" This shift from broad mission statements to specific, quantifiable goals can be seen in the fight to save endangered species. Providing a clear target helps engage a data-driven audience that wants to see the change.
For instance, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital established in Memphis in 1962 has significantly reduced childhood cancer mortality rates globally, from 80% to 20%. "When you see a statistic like that, it speaks louder than any story ever could," Missy says. "You feel that your dollars are supporting something meaningful that's actively changing the world."
One of the biggest challenges nonprofits face today is articulating their success in quantifiable terms. Many organizations state lofty goals, such as 'ending poverty' or 'alleviating hunger,' without specifying what success looks like. "If your mission is to alleviate hunger, what does that mean? Are you aiming to reduce food insecurity by a certain percentage in a specific region within xyz number of years? You need milestones," this visionary leader insists. Without one, organizations risk falling into what she calls 'mission drift' - continuing to operate without ever knowing if they will truly make a difference.
Take the example of breast cancer support services. A nonprofit may boast of helping 2,100 women in a given year, but what does that figure mean in context? If there are 200,000 women in need of these services in that region, then 2,100 is just 1% of the problem. "You may need to find a more efficient vehicle for delivering services because that scale isn't going to move the needle," the Mass-Tel Communications founder notes.
Transparency is now a key element of donor relations. In an age where information is at everyone's fingertips, nonprofits must go beyond traditional appeals and embrace a more accountable and data-driven model. "People today are inundated with information. They know that data can be doctored or manipulated, which builds mistrust," says Mastel. "The best way to counter that is with verifiable data; proof that you're not just talking, but actually doing."
This approach also helps maintain the nonprofit's long-term sustainability. "Every organization should aim to put itself out of business by solving the problem it was founded to address," she adds. "If you're not tracking progress, how do you know whether you have actually progressed?"
Missy Sue Mastel's call to action is clear: it's time for nonprofits to embrace accountability. "The work nonprofits do is essential to society. But to keep the trust of donors, stakeholders, and the communities they serve, they need to show exactly how they're making a difference – not just tell a story about the problems they want to solve."
For this dedicated advocate, who has more than 25 years of outstanding success in shaping and communicating real impact for non-profit organizations, it's not about doing away with storytelling but enhancing it with real-world proof. The future of nonprofit funding isn't about who can tug the hardest on the heartstrings, but who can deliver the most meaningful impact that results in real-world change.
© Copyright IBTimes 2024. All rights reserved.